The Key Editorial Board weighs the pros and cons of becoming a conservative fraternity. The author argues that the success of Kappa has been due to the radical nature of the fraternity. In this case, a conservative fraternity is one that slows governmental action, cuts off weaker chapters, refuses to exchange ideas, and limits the number of members in a chapter amongst other things. The Pros include better possibilities for internal office work, increased punctuality, and uniformity of chapters. The disadvantages include decrease of power and influence, lost opportunities, and functional disturbances. They conclude that Kappa should not become a conservative fraternity.
Mar 1886
